its been a while.. but thought this may be of interest

topic posted Sun, December 10, 2006 - 6:57 AM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
heres a very different way of potentially explaining the reason behind the fermi paradox....

pehaps we have been using the wrong techniques

malcolm.mcewen.googlepages.com/th...ion

any comments

GM23
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • It's certainly possible that civilizations which advance beyond our stage of development use some additional force of Nature that we have not yet discovered as their primary means of communication, and that therefore we aren't detecting their signals. But that still doesn't explain why we can't detect anything that they're doing at all, since some of the actions of an advanced civilization -- flying large starships, modifying the output of their stars, etc. -- would be incredibly obvious even at interstellar distances. It also doesn't explain why we can't detect any radio emissions from civilizations at around <i>our</i> level of development (we've had radio about a century now with little sign of abandoning it, surely at least <i>some</i> other civilizations must keep it about as long). And most of all, it doesn't answer the <i>main</i> Fermi Paradox: "Where are they?" Because advanced civilizations would be able to construct starships, and colonize the whole of our Galaxy.

    And yes. They could even bring the soil along with them -- if, at their level of technology, they still needed soil. Hey, <i>I'd</i> bring some -- I <i>like</i> looking at green growing things.
    • B
      B
      offline 120
      We can't detect any radio signals at our level of development becaue we look at such a small part of the sky and our receivers do not have the sensitivity to detect signals that were not beamed directly at us with massive amounts of power. Like we have tried to target stars that we find "promissing". We still put too much "faith" in the technology we have.
      • That's certainly possible. On the other hand, it does tell us that radio-transmitting technological civilizations are rare in our corner of the Galaxy.

        Mind you, pre- and post-radio technlogical civilizations might be widespread, for all we know.
        • B
          B
          offline 120
          <On the other hand, it does tell us that radio-transmitting technological civilizations are rare in our corner of the Galaxy. >

          No it does not mean that at all. The one does not follow from the other. Out lack of receiver or their lack of power does not mean the the near by stars are not awash with aliens with low power cell phones. It does mean they have sent us so little power that our very insensitive receivers hear nothing but the galactic background noise.

Recent topics in "Fermi Paradox"